Posts Tagged ‘local government’

2013: More Rejection Letters

Select Rejection Letters 2013–Need I say more?
06/03/2013: Dear [     ]
We would like to thank you for applying to the above vacancy.

After a careful review of the background and qualifications of all candidates, we regret to inform you that you have not been selected for the shortlist.  Although you were not short-listed for this position, you may want to continue to review the opportunities in myJobWorld (http://myjobworld).  

We would like to take this opportunity to wish you continued success in the future and to thank you for your interest in this position.  
Kind regards,
Human Resources Services
The World Bank Group

NOTE: THIS MESSAGE IS SYSTEM GENERATED – YOU CANNOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE.

05/14/2013: Thank you for your interest in the International Relations faculty position
at UC Berkeley. This search was highly competitive, and unfortunately your application is no longer under consideration. We appreciate the time and energy invested in your application, and encourage you to apply for positions listed in the future. 

We wish you every personal and professional success with your job search.

Sincerely,
Kathleen Spaw
Academic Personnel Analyst

Re: Position 1758 – UC Berkeley International Relations Faculty Position

05/14/2013:

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY    
USCIS HR OPERATIONS CENTER    
70 KIMBALL AVENUE
SOUTH BURLINGTON VT  05403    

 Dear [           ]    

   This refers to the application you recently submitted to this office for the position below:    

Position Title: Entry Level Attorney    
Pay Plan:       GS   
Series/Grade: 0905-12    
Vacancy ID:      826700    
Announcement Number:      CIS-826700-COU    

Hiring Office: US Citizenship and Immigration Services    

Results regarding your recent referral to the Hiring Official are as follows:    

Referral Type:      Non-Traditional  
Appointment Type: Excepted Service Permanent    
Specialty / Grade:      0905 – 12    
Promotion Potential:      15    
Locations: Location Negotiable After Selection    

Thank you for applying for this position.  Your application has been considered.  However, another applicant was selected.  We appreciate your interest in employment with our agency.    
Audit Code:    NS    
Code Definition:    Not Selected    
Code Explanation:    

The selecting office has indicated that you were not selected for the position.    

Thank you for your interest in Federal employment.  You are encouraged to visit http://www.usajobs.gov to view additional Federal employment opportunities and information.    

PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS EMAIL MESSAGE.  IT IS AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED.    

For additional information, please refer to the vacancy announcement for this position.    

05/03/2013
Recently we received your resume/application for the Humanities/Philosophy, Undergraduate School – Adjunct Faculty (Req# 8644) position at UMUC. Unfortunately, the University has decided that the position will not be recruited at this time. Please visit our career page where you can explore other opportunities that may be of interest http://www.umuc.edu/employment .

Thank you for your time and interest in UMUC. 
Sincerely, 
Talent Acquisition
Office of Human Resources

04/29/2013:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY    
USCIS HR OPERATIONS CENTER    
70 KIMBALL AVENUE
SOUTH BURLINGTON VT  05403    

Dear [         ]
This refers to the application you recently submitted to this office for the position below:    

   Position Title: Entry Level Attorney    
   Pay Plan:  GS    
   Series/Grade: 0905-11    
   Vacancy ID:      826700    
   Announcement Number: CIS-826700-COU    

   Hiring Office: US Citizenship and Immigration Services    

Results regarding your recent referral to the Hiring Official are as follows:    

   Referral Type: Non-Traditional  
   Appointment Type: Excepted 
     Service Permanent    
   Specialty / Grade:      0905 – 11    
   Promotion Potential:      15    
   Locations: Location Negotiable After Selection    

Thank you for applying for this position.  Your application has been considered.  However, another applicant was selected.  We appreciate your interest in employment with our agency.    

   Audit Code:   NS    
   Code Definition:   Not Selected  
   Code Explanation:    

The selecting office has indicated that you were not selected for the position.    

Thank you for your interest in Federal employment.  You are encouraged to visit http://www.usajobs.gov to view additional Federal employment opportunities and information.    

PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS EMAIL MESSAGE.  IT IS AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED.    

For additional information, please refer to the vacancy announcement for this position.

04/26/2013:    
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR US ATTYS    
DO NOT MAIL APPLICATIONS    
YOU MUST APPLY ONLINE
WASHINGTON DC  20530    

Dear [          ]

This refers to the application you recently submitted to this office for the position below:    

   Position Title: Assistant United 
    States Attorney    
   Vacancy ID:      844037    
   Series/Grade:    N/A    

The agency has cancelled  or postponed filling this vacancy.    

Thank you for your interest in Federal employment.  You are encouraged to visit http://www.usajobs.gov to view additional Federal employment opportunities and information.    

 PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS EMAIL MESSAGE.  IT IS AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED.    

For additional information, please refer to the vacancy announcement for this position.

04/15/2013:
[AP Search] JPF00011 J.D./LL.M./J.S.D. Program Tenured Faculty Search

Dear Applicant,
The Search Committee has concluded their review of applicants for the J.D./L.L.M/J.S.D. Program faculty position at Berkeley Law. There were a number of candidates applying for the position, and after much consideration, we regret to inform you that your application is no longer under consideration. 

We appreciate your patience during this long review process and thank you for your interest.

– Berkeley Law, Academic Positions    

04/06/2013: 
Hello [            ]
Thank you for taking the time to apply with us. We are unable to offer you a position at this time, but we do appreciate your interest in Target.

Target (YOU READ CORRECTLY-T-A-R-G-E-T)

For years trying these tactics have not and still do not work:  Informational interviewing with former professors, colleagues, referrals and attorneys I met at conferences didn’t help, going to different cities and knocking door to door to speak with legal secretaries and receptionists, parking lots of different businesses, and handing out one’s resume provided no leads though I get “You have all this” and “you seem great”, discussing the issue with volunteers at non-profits only to be provided the “you are doing everything right” or “that’s a shame,” registering at different state employment agencies though providing free services and undergoing verbal abuse and contempt on a daily basis by civil (oxymoron) workers who find out how educated you are leads to them not wanting them to help you or to see you succeed as they complain about how they did not “get” a chance to go to university and it doesn’t matter because these places focus on retail, IT or blue collar jobs that have no intetest in you; professional outreach workshops and networking provided few leads all the while continuously applying to jobs blind via online and postal mail; including those advertised at federal agencies, which provided no compensation at the federal Assistant Attorneys Office to only be told you are eligible; qualified; ranked among the best qualified and have the credentials and more but [herein lies the secret-you’re not white; you’re not male; you’re not IVY League; you don’t have connections; how would it look for us politically–in other words, for whichever reasons, we do not want YOUR kind here]

Don’t take a gamble with your future, especially if you’re a minority. Sallie Mae doesn’t care how hard you try, they will devour you.

Advertisements

Economy, job losses, higher taxes, homelessness, debt, oh my!

All rights reserved

Today we are reporting regional play by play of the economy and job loss:  Sallie Mae: Yes, District of Columbia-metro area residents, it’s right in your backyard. Remember the jobs cuts from those big corporations such as Citigroup, AIG and the like and their failing assets? Well, I highly doubt Sallie Mae is suffering as it can thrive on the interest payments alone that are paid by unemployed professionals, those who financed their education at trade schools and other institutes of learning. But did you know Sallie Mae decided to lay off a major segment of employees and close locations? (March 2010-http://washington.bizjournals.com/washington/stories/2010/03/22/daily16.html) Not only are federal jobs few and hard to come by, major regional corporations aren’t hiring but firing.So for people who continue to say that DC is a “good” place to move in this down economy are highly mistaken. An article published in December listed Maryland and Virginia around 15 out of 55 of the states [I know there aren’t 55 states, but that’s how the article designated it] with the HIGHEST unemployment while California was much lower on the scale (ok I’m kind of surprised too). So that’s only Virginia, Washington, DC, what about Maryland? Well, as most people know, southern Maryland as well as some residents further north (such as Baltimore) and Pennsylvania commute all the way to the District of Columbia to work.  Now, DC wants to tax commuters for working in DC, though these commuters already pay their own state, local and federal taxes based on where they live (http://www.wusa9.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=101759&catid=158). But what of those who work in Maryland? This past winter increased Maryland’s deficit because of the snowcastrophe also known as a blizzard. Maryland went over its budget to render the clearing, salting and snow removal services. So what will they do, well, how about we tax people again? You know take more money people don’t have.   Now more Marylanders are scheduled to lose jobs next week, an estimated 600, specifically Baltimore city workers. ( http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9EL6N7G0.htm   ). I think Baltimore city needs to raise  over 40 million and should they not be able to render an agreement with trade unions the city government will have to raise another 64 million. Can uou imagine even more disgruntled laid off city civil workers roaming around Maryland in addition to the 100,000 unemployed Marylanders with a depleted unemployment insurance fund? You think crime is bad now, let’s watch the next few feeks. Run for the border.

…while New Jersey prepares for budget cuts, ok proposals to lay off workers (more?) in their state:  Tens of thousands rally against New Jersey budget cuts http://www.wsws.org/articles/2010/may2010/newj-m24.shtml). The state wants to eliminate free lunch for poor school students? Everyone knows that having meals, especially breakfast contributes to energy and academic performance. The snowball continues to roll bigger and bigger.

In New York the state is trying to balance their budget which is affecting local universities: New York’s Budget Woes Could lead to Furloughs, Layoffs at SUNY, May 26, 2010 http://www.wgrz.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=77276&catid=37

In California the government proposes to cut teachers (Solano County teacher union chief among hundreds to protest cuts http://www.thereporter.com/news/ci_15163841) is it just me or do some of these states find schools and education dispensible? One California state university is laying off staff to balance their budget: (Sacramento State lays off staff to cover $26M shortfall – Sacramento Business Journal May 25, 2010)

Recently, a Texas state university laid off employees and plans to cut more (Univ. of Texas lays off 122 workers, may cut more, May 11, 2010 http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9FKMRKO0.htm)

Although states are not doing well, this article claims that local economy within Ohio isn’t doing so bad: (Construction jobs boost economy: http://www.mariettatimes.com/page/content.detail/id/522157.html?nav=5002)

The good news I guess is that Congress is considering extending unemployment benefits again (.http://www.marketwatch.com/story/12-million-unemployed-may-lose-federal-benefits-2010-05-24)..because: Jobless Claims Rise By Largest Amount In 3 Months (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=103396584 and choice (D) “All of the above”.